Using Reactance Theory to Motivate Non-Motivated Learners in English Language Learning

Using Reactance Theory to Motivate Non-Motivated Learners in English Language Learning

Reverse psychology, a technique that involves prompting someone to do the opposite of what’s suggested, can be an effective tool in the language classroom—especially for motivating reluctant English learners. When used thoughtfully, reverse psychology encourages students to take ownership of their learning, challenge themselves, and engage in activities they may otherwise resist. This article explores practical ways TESOL teachers can use reverse psychology to nudge students toward active participation in speaking and learning English.


1. The “Challenge” Technique

Sometimes students may shy away from speaking English due to fear of failure or embarrassment. In such cases, issuing a friendly “challenge” can stimulate motivation.

Example: “Most students find this speaking exercise a bit too difficult on the first try. But I can always tell when someone’s ready to take it on confidently. Let’s see if anyone’s up for it!”

This approach plants the idea that trying is a sign of capability and confidence, prompting students to volunteer to prove their ability. Positioning speaking activities as challenges, rather than mandatory tasks, invites students to rise to the occasion on their own terms.


2. Reverse Role Assignments

Assigning roles that might typically go to more advanced or vocal students can spark engagement in quieter or less motivated learners. For example, designating a quieter student as the discussion leader or group spokesperson subtly encourages them to step out of their comfort zone.

Example: In a group discussion, say, “I usually choose the student who’s least interested in speaking to lead, but that might be too challenging here. I’ll let [Student’s Name] lead only if they’re ready for it.”

By giving the less engaged student a leadership role, you communicate confidence in their abilities. Often, students will feel compelled to try, particularly if they interpret it as a chance to defy expectations.


3. Curiosity-Based Statements

Creating intrigue can make students more eager to participate. When introducing a vocabulary set or grammar point, suggest that the content might be too complex or “not for everyone,” sparking curiosity.

Example: “We’re covering a new set of idioms today, but they might be too advanced for some people. I’d only recommend it for those who are up for a bit of a challenge.”

This can be especially effective with teenagers or young adults, who often respond to the implicit “dare” by engaging more attentively. By framing the lesson as an exclusive, “advanced” challenge, students may feel more inclined to participate and prove themselves capable.


4. The “You Don’t Have to Participate” Approach

For students hesitant to participate in speaking exercises, removing the pressure can sometimes have the opposite effect. By telling them they don’t have to participate, they may feel less resistant and actually choose to engage.

Example: Before a class debate or role-play, say, “Feel free to observe this activity if you’re not ready to join yet. But you’re welcome to jump in anytime.”

This relaxed approach reduces the anxiety of speaking on demand and allows students to join the activity on their own terms. Often, students will join midway or ask to participate, especially if they see their classmates having fun or succeeding.


5. The “Secret Competency” Technique

Frame a challenging aspect of learning English as something that only “a few” will be able to master, subtly encouraging students to prove their abilities.

Example: When teaching pronunciation or complex sentence structures, say, “Only a handful of students ever really master this. It’s quite difficult, so don’t feel bad if it takes a while.”

This statement leverages students’ desire to succeed where others may struggle. When students feel that achieving a difficult task will set them apart, they often make an extra effort to improve, leading to better engagement and self-motivation.


6. Highlighting the “Easy Parts” of English

Sometimes, reverse psychology works by playing down the importance of certain tasks, making them appear easier than students initially thought. For instance, instead of emphasizing the challenge of a task, make it seem simple and unintimidating.

Example: When introducing a basic speaking activity, say, “This is just a simple exercise, so it doesn’t require much effort. If you’re not comfortable with it, feel free to skip it.”

By suggesting the activity isn’t difficult, students may feel more confident to attempt it. This approach is particularly useful with shy students or those lacking confidence, as it removes the fear of failure and helps build self-assurance.


7. Setting “Low” Expectations

For students who may be resistant to participation, setting an intentionally low bar can encourage them to exceed expectations. Expressing surprise or encouragement when they do more than expected reinforces their accomplishment.

Example: In a writing activity, say, “Just try to write a sentence or two, no need to make it long or complex. Anything you write is good enough for today.”

Often, students will write more than anticipated, motivated by the absence of pressure. When they see that their contributions are recognized and valued, it can foster greater willingness to engage more fully in future tasks.


8. Highlighting Absence of Consequence

For tasks where students are afraid of making mistakes, reducing the perceived consequence of errors can motivate them to try. Remind students that attempting and learning are valued over correctness.

Example: For a new speaking drill, say, “This is just for fun—no grades, no points deducted for mistakes. In fact, some students might even surprise themselves with how well they do!”

With this low-stakes environment, students feel more comfortable experimenting, as mistakes are normalized as part of learning. The lack of consequence for errors reduces fear and often leads to more enthusiastic participation.


Final Thoughts: Reverse Psychology as a Tool for Confidence and Engagement

The exact origin of the term “reverse psychology” is not attributed to a single individual. However, the concept is rooted in reactance theory, developed by psychologist Jack Brehm in 1966. Reactance theory suggests that people have a natural tendency to resist constraints on their freedom of choice, which can lead them to do the opposite of what they’re told, especially if they feel their autonomy is threatened.

The term “reverse psychology” emerged over time as a popular way to describe the practice of encouraging someone to act in a certain way by suggesting the opposite, capitalizing on this psychological tendency for reactance. While Brehm’s work provided the theoretical basis, “reverse psychology” became more widely used in everyday language to describe this tactic in both personal and educational settings.

Reverse psychology can be a powerful motivator for non-motivated English learners, especially when used to create a sense of curiosity, reduce performance pressure, and encourage autonomy. These strategies should be used thoughtfully, always maintaining respect for students’ comfort levels and unique personalities. By fostering an environment where students feel invited rather than required to participate, teachers can help even the most reluctant learners build confidence and engage actively in the learning process. With the right prompts and encouragement, reverse psychology can inspire students to take ownership of their language journey, one challenge at a time.

Discover the world while teaching English abroad. Explore FAQs about TESOL, and TESOL certification courses.